This menu shows you other areas of this website and various areas of interest. It is a quick locator.
You are currently in a library. This takes you to the top level of Household - HSBC Watch consumer advocates and watchdogs
This takes you to the complaints library and all recent complaints about HSBC, HFC, Beneficial Finance, and their merchants since 2007
Monitor the latest news about HSBC Plc, HSBC USA, the bank and HSBC Finance Corp from around the world in this watchdog area
See articles, stories, and complaints about HSBC and Household International since 2005 in this interactive library
Submit your complaint to our watchdogs. We perform trend analysis and need your help. Complaints are noted by type and processed
Get help with this one-click form just by entering your zip code in this form. You can even contact the media
You're browsing: Archived News » 2007 HSBC » Article Title: Fines, forfeitures, and restitution in Connecticut mortgages

This report was submitted by a Connecticut resident. The submitter is responsible for the accuracy of this report, and personal opinions are his:

These are the attorney’s handling many HSBC Mortgage Services foreclosures in Connecticut. Looks like birds of a feather do flock together. A law firm, mortgage company and real estate broker will pay $700,000 in fines, forfeitures and restitution to the state of Connecticut to settle allegations they engaged in illegal kickback and inducement schemes.

Paying the $700,000 are the law firm Reiner, Reiner & Bendett, P.C., of Farmington, Absolute Mortgage Solutions, LLC, of East Hartford and Access America, LCC, DBA Century 21 Access America of Wethersfield.

Of the money, $125,000 will pay restitution to about 500 Absolute consumers who overpaid for certain mortgage-related services as a result of one of the schemes.

In an October lawsuit filed on behalf of the Department of Consumer Protection and the Insurance Department, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal alleged that Reiner, which also sells title insurance, used sham service, rental and other agreements to conceal $142,200 in kickbacks and unlawful inducements between 2002 and 2005. In exchange, Absolute and Access allegedly steered title insurance business to the law firm. Connecticut law prohibits title insurance agents from paying for referrals.

“This law firm used service and other sham contracts to camouflage kickbacks and sidetrack state law,” said Blumenthal.

According to the attorney general, Reiner and Absolute conspired to conceal illegal payments as fake fees, secretly forcing consumers to cover the cost of kickbacks. In addition, he said the law firm hid illicit payments to Access in phony ‘marketing’ and ‘rental’ agreements. These steering schemes increased consumers’ costs and denied choice.

“Each of about 500 consumers will receive $200 early in the New Year. These firms will rightly give back their ill-gotten gains to compensate consumers and help the state fight similar schemes. I will fight to enforce state laws banning kickbacks and other anticompetitive practices that increase costs to consumers,” Blumenthal added.

Reiner agreed to pay mortgage broker Absolute $200 per customer to perform certain closing services, including ordering a title search, assembling closing documents, assuring insurance was in place and coordinating the closing. Reiner paid Absolute $76,200 in 2004 under the agreement.

Consumers, however, had already paid Absolute for the same and other services. Blumenthal and Sullivan charged that the arrangement was a ruse to conceal illegal payments to Absolute for steering customers to Reiner for their title insurance.

Under the settlement, about 500 Absolute customers are eligible to receive $200, returning unnecessary fees charged them to underwrite the kickback scheme.

Reiner used two other bogus agreements to conceal $66,000 in kickbacks to Access between 2002 and 2005. One contract called for Reiner to pay Access for nonexistent “marketing” services. Under a second oral agreement, Reiner paid Access to “rent” space in Access offices for closings and other business.

Of the $700,000, $125,000 will compensate Absolute consumers, $425,000 will be deposited into the state’s General Fund and the remainder used for consumer education by the Attorney General’s Office, DCP and the Insurance Department.

The agreement caps a two-year joint investigation by the Insurance Department and the Attorney General’s Office. The investigation was prompted by unusual market activity reported to the Insurance Department. DCP and the Banking Department also participated.

Verification of this submission can be seen in this article

CF

Related posts:

  1. Massachusetts accuses Block of deceptive mortgages
  2. Mortgage industry reform bill adds money for enforcement
  3. Legal action against HSBC Mortgage Services Inc
  4. Washington State AG needs HSBC information
  5. 400 people charged with mortgage fraud

   Digg   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Reddit   RSS  

Find specific results on any of our sites: Category: 2007 HSBC
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.