This menu shows you other areas of this website and various areas of interest. It is a quick locator.
You are currently in a library. This takes you to the top level of Household - HSBC Watch consumer advocates and watchdogs
This takes you to the complaints library and all recent complaints about HSBC, HFC, Beneficial Finance, and their merchants since 2007
Monitor the latest news about HSBC Plc, HSBC USA, the bank and HSBC Finance Corp from around the world in this watchdog area
See articles, stories, and complaints about HSBC and Household International since 2005 in this interactive library
Submit your complaint to our watchdogs. We perform trend analysis and need your help. Complaints are noted by type and processed
Get help with this one-click form just by entering your zip code in this form. You can even contact the media
You're browsing: Archived News » 2007 HSBC » Article Title: How HSBC is doing U.S. layoffs said to be vicious

We all know HSBC is laying off personnel at Beneficial Finance and HFC offices. That is no secret. How it is being handled is fast becoming public knowledge, as reports are coming in. Some HSBC tactics are alarming. Please evaluate this statement:

“I was a District Sales Manager (executive level position) that was let go, and instead of paying severance, HSBC said I violated policy. I asked what policy, and they asked me to go into a room with a pen & paper and write down anything I ever did wrong in my 10 years with the company. Never in my ten years was I ever given a warning for doing anything wrong. When I truthfuly stated I had NEVER violated company policy, they then said they dont believe me, I asked for proof, they said you dont need proof in Virginia. Virginia is an “at-will state” which means you can be let go for any reason, and as long as you were not legally discriminated, you are out of luck. This was a vicious tactic to save some money.”

The entire post can be seen here. The law differs in each state, and some are different for hourly employees as opposed to salaried employees, but it is imperative that the dismissed employee should follow up immediately. Employers lobbied lawmakers for a short time frame and dismissed employees often has no case after 90 or 180 days. The other option is to prove that similar tactics were used elsewhere, opening a whole new legal case.

Related posts:

  1. Employee theory of HSBC layoffs and seniority
  2. Metris Layoffs Announced
  3. HSBC layoffs in Virginia
  4. HSBC Emotional Link and Layoffs Through 2008
  5. Question about more layoffs at Beneficial and HFC

   Digg   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Reddit   RSS  

Find specific results on any of our sites: Category: 2007 HSBC
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.