This menu shows you other areas of this website and various areas of interest. It is a quick locator.
You are currently in a library. This takes you to the top level of Household - HSBC Watch consumer advocates and watchdogs
This takes you to the complaints library and all recent complaints about HSBC, HFC, Beneficial Finance, and their merchants since 2007
Monitor the latest news about HSBC Plc, HSBC USA, the bank and HSBC Finance Corp from around the world in this watchdog area
See articles, stories, and complaints about HSBC and Household International since 2005 in this interactive library
Send your complaint to our watchdogs where we perform trend analysis and need your help. Complaints are noted by type and processed
Get help with this one-click form just by entering your zip code in this form. You can even contact the media
You're browsing: Complaints » Escrow Issues » Article Title: HSBC escrow shortfall for taxes looks strange

MG in New York said: “I have been paying mortgage payments to HSBC since 2002 when I refinanced my home mortgage. In early 2008, the bank sent me a notice that my property tax increases had caused the bank to require a lump sum payment or an increase in my monthly payments. They requested a lump sum “shortfall” payment of $1,240 in order to balance my escrow account. I sent them the check for the $1,240. The very next mortgage statement was received, acknowledging the lump sum payment as my “escrow shortage payment” —but now asking for an additional $69.05 per month. This changed my payment from $2,634.21 to $2,703.26.

I called the bank to ask why, if I just sent them the appropriate shortfall payment, they needed yet another increase to my monthly payment. I was told that they needed this increase “just in case the taxes go up next year”. I told them I would agree to pay the shortage – if such shortage ever actually came about next year—just as I had previously done with my check for $1,240. However, I objected to them to trying to collect, in advance, a sum that wasn’t yet owed by them to pay for taxes that had yet to be increased.
I have received a notice that my last payment was short $69.05 and that because of this, they have not applied my entire last payment of $2,634.21.

I spoke to HSBC on several occasions and have yet to get an explanation of why they would be entitled to demand this monthly increase. No explanation beyond “we get it now in case your taxes go up next year” has been provided. I have read through my mortgage papers including “Initial Escrow Account Disclosure Statement”, the “Real Property Insurance Escrow Account Disclosure” and the Mortgage itself. Although the Mortgage does indicate the Lenders right to escrow monies for the upcoming year, no where does it state that the bank can collect beyond a year of escrow funds. I have yet to find a clause pertaining to this “speculative tax increase advance”. I am, however, hesitant to avoid payment of this additional fee as the bank will undoubtedly claim I have defaulted on my loan commitment.

I feel that this is an abuse by HSBC and I am asking my elected representatives for assistance. Has this sort of abuse been discussed on your web site?”

Related posts:

  1. HSBC Fails To Pay Escrow, Taxes, Insurance in Tennessee
  2. Forced foreclosure, no escrow, and a fly by night lender
  3. Georgia HSBC Escrow and Rudeness Issues Reported
  4. HSBC rep talks about investors and foreclosures
  5. HSBC Savings Account Withholds 28 Percent Taxes

   Digg   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Reddit   RSS  

Find specific results on any of our sites: Category: Escrow Issues
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.