Best Buy laptop maintenance is questionable at best
Ad in Kentucky says: “On the 31 I had decided to take my laptop in under my 3 year in store warranty as it had a manufacturing material defect in the plastic and had started to crack and break in 3 areas; the top latch above the monitor had cracked and no longer functioned properly, the plastics next to the mouse pad had become warped and started to crack, and the plastic on the bottom side of the laptop had also began to crack in a number of places. Before I took the laptop in I read my whole warranty and verified that these defects would be covered as I had never taken apart this laptop, spilled anything on it or dropped it.
When I arrived at Best Buy I got in line at the computer repair area near the front and presented my problem to the technician. He told me this should definitely be covered but it would have to be shipped off for a couple of weeks for the Casing to be repaired. I was fine with this as I’m a frequent customer of Best Buy and refer my own clients too them from my PC repair service, when they need to buy a computer or part. I was sure Best Buy would handle this in a professional manner and return my laptop to me fix in 2 weeks or less.
On the 5th I received a call from a Best Buy technician who informed me too my surprise that my laptop had had parts removed from it before I brought it in and therefore could not be covered under the warranty. I let the technician know I had never taken any parts out of this machine or disassembled it. The Technician told me that He was unable to let me speak to a manager at the moment but he would and would call me back afterwards. About an hour or more later I received a call back from best buy, The technician told me he had spoken with a manager and that nothing could be done to help me because the liquid spilled on the keyboard had voided my in store warranty. When I told the technician that nothing was mentioned about liquid before he denied ever telling me parts had been removed and in a sad attempt and a repair bait and switch offered to repair my computer for over 600 dollars. This was very bad, and not what I would expect from a store I had no problems with for many years. So I asked to speak to the manager. I was told that on Monday there is no manager in the store and I would have too wait till the next day for the manager too call me back, but the technician made it clean the manager would not care whether I was a valued customer, no matter what I was not going to be helped.
Since I had given my name and number and was promised a call the next day I waited at home all day for this call and no one ever called me too my disappointment. So I waited till the 7th and called too speak to a manager, after being forced to tell my story before I could speak to a manager I was told one was not available and even when I did talk to them that this issue was out of their hands and they would not help me when they could call me at 11AM . I once again left my name and number but was never called till late that night.
When I got a call late at night it still wasn’t a manager but another technician that told me the problem wasn’t liquid on the keyboard but liquid on the hard drive. I informed her when I turned in the laptop this was not a problem and it had too have happened after I gave it to them whether it be at their store, during, or after shipping but I should not be held responsible.
Later that night I called back and finally spoke with the store manager Chris. I gave him the full story. I was very happy when he told me his only option would be to swap out my laptop for an undamaged one after I asked him if he could be flexible with a valued customer that has allot of influence on who shops at his store. But then he said even though he had that flexibility and could do that for me if he wanted too, he was not going to do this for me. I then informed him I would have to escalate this to the corp. manager and he danced around it and would not give me the number too contact them. Then I told him I didn’t want to be rude but my only option was too contact the BBB and he said that would do me no good in this situation, so I let him know I would then have the option to contact others interested in consumer protections such as the KY district attorney. He made it clear to me that even though he was a store manager at Best Buy he had no idea what consumer protections meant or what a District Attorney even was.
I really don’t want too seem rude but my laptop was only used for normal usage was never taken apart and was never dropped, So I feel I am entitled too a repair of these defects under my warranty and am only taking this too the BBB because Best Buy has given me no other option and I need my laptop back and in good condition, not damaged as it seems to have become in the stores of best buy and geek squad. If this can’t be resolved many will be informed of this same detailed story.”
Thinking of making a debt settlement offer? See common settlement scams and rip-offs first or get our free widget










We monitor customer trends for possible violations of Regulation Z and other possible illegal actions.
Ummmm…. what does this have to do with HSBC/HFC?
Best Buy is an HSBC merchant. Insurance and other up-sells are called onging compensation and is part of the contract with HSBC and Best Buy. Therefore we publish all information that pertains to merchants signed under HSBC private label programs.
The insurance upsell from HSBC has nothing to do with the service not being provided by Best Buy. That is a Best Buy service issue. The customer doesn’t contact HSBC when Best Buy fails to live up to their end of the agreement. In your attempt to bash all things HSBC, perhaps an idea would be to, and this is just a suggestion, TELL THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!
We publish all information that pertains to merchants signed under HSBC private label programs. IF you wish to study the cash flow behind private label programs study EchoSphere vs Household. It is in the public record because Household was sued for that too, and they lost. Subsequent to that Best Buy was sued, which opened up more court documents. In the OCC open comment process of October 2002, as HSBC attempted to buy Household International, the matter of ongoing compensation was raised, and therefore studied by attorneys for the U.S. Government and attorneys for HSBC. It is important because of Shea vs Household (HSBC)(2004)and all those late fees you comment on, which are not really late at all. Whether it is an insurance upsell or illegal late fees, the audit trail speaks of racketeering, influence and corruption (RICO). Thus we monitor all complaints. Racketeering charges against Best Buy and Microsoft were recently upheld (2007) as valid by the U.S. Supreme Court. There is your audit trail for the National Association of Attorney’s General. You are not helping HSBC’s case by making fun of everyone who reports shady late fees. Every single complaintant has been advised to send a report to their individual attorney general. We solicit complaints about HSBC’s merchants so we can perform trend analysis. I will write a formal quarterly report to the Association of Attorney’s General tomorrow. Thank you for the motivation to do so.
We perform trend analysis regarding HSBC and HSBC merchants. Live complaints in this blog are published the day they are received. Trend analysis requires a time line adequate to gather the data using statistic, ie., the mean, medium, and norm. I invite you to read our open letter to HSBC, Knight-Vinke, and Stephen Green. The link is above the menu.
Does HSBC collect monies relative to Best Buy under a contract? Yes they do. Is there a trend whereby Best Buy fails to perform under a maintenance contract? Trend analysis will give the answer after an adequate period of time. Regarding RICO the time line is ten years.
In ruling on previous (the legal precedent) RICO claims, the court held that your company “operated a scheme to defraud customers, distinct from the other ordinary business dealings each conducted, whereby Block would attract and mislead customers into purchasing extremely expensive loans from Beneficial in exchange for a cut of the profits.”
To make a case you must have a precedent, an adequate time line, and proof. The time frame for RICO is 10 years. Two laptop problems in ten years. For RICO to apply, the enterprise must be shown to have engaged in a “pattern of racketeering activity,” which means that one must show at least two “acts of racketeering activity” over a period of ten years. An “act of racketeering activity” consists of one of a lengthy list of state and federal crimes. Note that the statute does not require conviction of an “act of racketeering activity” but only that the act have been committed.
Perhaps Best Buy maintenance and warranty issues are not the real issue? More likely is the fact that payments made on time and processed as late payments qualify for RICO. When investigators ask if that is the only qualifier we back it up with the maintenance issue. Have I made my time line and position perfectly clear now? Shea vs Household, paid by HSBC, went back 10 years, and covered 1994 through 2004. You said ‘and discuss things that happened in 2002 in order to help “support” your position’ - so have I made the reason why perfectly clear?
Again, read my open letter. The legal discussions going on right now are none of your business.